※2定期交換すべきパーツ⇒既にあるかもしれませんが、各金型毎で定期交換

※ You may already parts
⇒ to be two periodic replacement, but there was confirmation
⇒ check sheet of the list

※ 3 consumption site for periodic replacement in each each mold, but the standard
because only check, numbers Please be sure to mention a number things that troublesome case, quantitative management If you place I want to specify, such as the standard
.

★ it had been calibrated actually
management of measuring equipment, but I would like correct management of measuring
replacements lack of seal, such as calibration delay is directly linked to the quality

※ I think the system iso, of ts already
By way of example
Please mechanism presented to either of missing what is bad, and not missing future, first, to review all, and I think that should planning table a ( you but, for example, to clarify the education who will check)
every month and to check if the measure's use

* 2 Regular exchange to be part
⇒ periodic replacement in each die may be there already, but the list

* 3 expendable parts check
⇒ check sheets, but only check so
wants State standards or values
put standards and cumbersome, the numerical control is described by a number make sure.

★ measurement equipment management
that was calibrated to the actual calibration delay, seal replacement deficiencies is
want to for redress because measurement equipment management is directly linked to the quality

* Already have systems of ISO, TS and I think
mechanism to do anything bad, and came out next to present the
example, and first of all, all review, planning table （ think there should be a ）
clear to check if every month who check the measurement by using education such as

I may already have part
⇒ which you should change regularly of ※ 2, but there was the confirmation
⇒ check seat of 3 list

※ consumption parts to change with every each die regularly, but the thing managing the numerical value please list
standards to want you to specify it such as a
standard, numerical value with numerical value because it is only a check when I can enter when it is troublesome.

It was proofreaded by true management
of the ★ metering equipment, but the exchange of the seal is imperfect, and there are proofreading delays, and please correct the management of the
measuring machine because I am connected directly with quality

Think ※ to be already it in ISO, a system of TS, but can't outrun you in future whether is bad, and was able to outrun
what; when set it up, and please show it, and raise
example, at first all review it; a schedule (think that there should be it, but make education to let confirm it when a gauger uses it clear whether ,)
every month who confirms it)