これについては、加工費のところに関しB34については、ワーカーの最低賃

これについては、加工費のところに関し
B34については、ワーカーの最低賃金アップ分(2016年12.9% up)が吸収出来きれず、
本機種のように小ロットのモデルに限り、Chargeを変更させて頂き、加工費をアップさせて頂きました。
特に-10に関しては、数量が少ない為、加工費アップ分が大きくなっております。
しかしながら、オーバーヘッドは5%になっていた為、3%に変更し、全体コストアップ額を
ダウンさせました。
ロットが少ないモデルの価格を見直させて頂きたいという、弊社のリクエスト内容になっています。

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

This addition concerning cost of construction so farWorkers ' minimum wage up minutes for B34 (2016, 12.9% up), good absorptionOnly small lot model in this model, the Charge be changed, Kato gave up the cost.In particular-10 the quantity is less added cost up-we are getting bigger.For overhead, however, be 5 percent was 3%, and change to the total costLet down.Becoming has bluffing, we thank them reviewed prices of small lot model.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

For this , processing costs in the place of it related to
B34 For , of worker minimum wage up minutes ( 2016 year 12.9% up) is able to absorb Kirezu ,
this Model as a small model of the lot is limited Ri , Charge the change is not in the top -out , processing costs and thereby up to the top came .
Especially in the - 10 in the related are , the quantity is small not because, processing cost up content is large it becomes hear .
However , the overhead is 5% had become due, 3% to modify the entire cost amounts to
it was brought down .
Lot less of the model not price the and reviewing by top in that freaky , our request of content has become a .

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

In view of this, in terms of processing cost in B at a minimum wage of workers in 12.9 minutes up that cannot be absorbed as they apply to this model, the model of the small lot I changed, I was Charge increased processing cost. In particular, for 10 minutes, small in volume and the processing cost is greatly increased. However, at 5 in the overhead, change, was down at all costs. AtAnd I want you to review a lot less price in our model, the content of the request. Too