P/No.75W010-0110 (CUSHION, SHIFT LE

P/No.75W010-0110 (CUSHION, SHIFT LEVER ANTI-RATTLE)
材料変更により取り数 25664について
- NBR、FKM の材質はどう違っていますか。
ニトリルゴムとフッ素ゴムという違いがあります。もちろん特性が大きく違います。
具体的にどう異なるかはこちらでは確認が難しく、材料を指定された御社設計様へ
お問い合わせ頂ければより明確に違いを御確認できるかと思います。
- FKMを使う場合、取り数を256にしたらどんな影響がありますか。説明願います。
FKMで256個取りにした場合、プレス機がすべてのキャビティ上の材料を押し切れず、
適切な圧力を加えることができない為、結果妥当な品質の製品を作ることができません。
- 取り数64と256で作られる部品の品質はどう違いますか。
64キャビティーで作られたものはどんなことで256キャビティーより品質がよいのですか。
配置も関係している為、一概にはそうとは言えませんがキャビティが少ない分、上記の理由で品質を確保しやすいです。
- 金型費 (256Cav.--> Mold cost 210,000, 64Cav.--> Mold cost 100,000)
型費の下がり方は正しいかどうか判断できませんので、金型費の計算方法を教えてもらいませんか。
型屋から細かな明細がでませんので、金型費の計算は分かりかねます。

75W010-0120 (Cushion Spring)
- R部（corner size( R )）は1以下ですが、どうして1.5のときより難しいのですか。
EDMで加工しない場合、どんな問題が起こりますか。
エンドミルでは大きさの都合上指定されたRの大きさが加工できませんのでEDMが必要となります。

75W010-0130 (Ring)
材料変更により取り数が少ないことについて
- NBR(TRSB)とNBR(TRSB508)の材質は？
TRSBとTRSB508で選定した材料が異なります。
- NBR(TRSB508)を使う場合、どうして取り数は196にできないのですか。どんな品質問題が起こりますか。
基本的には0110と同じ理由です。弊社生産技術が判断しました結果、196個取りよりも64個取りの方が妥当と判断されました。
- 金型費 (196Cav.--> Mold cost 138,000, 64Cav.--> Mold cost 80,000)
型費の下がり方は正しいかどうか判断できませんので、金型費の計算方法を教えてもらいませんか。
型屋から細かな明細がでませんので、金型費の計算は分かりかねます。

75W010-0140 (Bush)
- 材料を変えることでTransfer moldingにする理由は何ですか。材料の性質は何ですか。
加硫時の流動性です。
- Transfer moldingにすることで品質を向上するという話しがありますが、何が良くなりますか。
上記の理由です。
Transfer moldingにして品質が良くなったらどうして他の部番も同様にしないのですか。
材料により使い分けています。コスト上コンプで行けるものはコンプにした方が、コスト効率が良い為です。

上記の質問について打ち合わせで説明できるように準備願います。
打ち合わせは来週中（2015年9月14～18日）にしたいと思っています。
打ち合わせの予定を確定したら連絡させてもらいます。

よろしくお願い致します。

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

P/No.75W010-0110 (CUSHION, SHIFT LEVER ANTI-RATTLE)For material changes to the normalized number 256  64Or - NBR, FKM material is not different.Have the fluorine rubber and nitrile rubber. Of course the property differently.Or more specifically how different is hard to see, your design specified material toI think if you contact us to clarify differences confirm can be or.-Have no effect when using the FKM, take the number 256 once? Explanation please.If you get 256 in FKM, presses 押shi切rezu cavities on all materials,For not applying proper pressure results cannot make a reasonable quality products.Remove - what difference between the quality of parts made with the number 64 and 256.Is made of 64 cavities in 256 cavity is better quality. Order placement is also involved is debatable so the is easier to ensure quality in fewer cavities is not the above reasons.-Mold fee (cost 100000 of 64Cav.--> Mold 256Cav.--> Mold cost 210000)Because it cannot determine whether the correct type costs falling, so tell me mold fee calculation. -Leaves small-slip, so cannot understand the mould cost calculation.75W010-0120 (Cushion Spring)-R (corner size (R)) is less than one, why 1.5 more difficult?What happens if not machined by EDM? EDM needs as R end mill specified size on size cannot be processed.75W010-0130 (Ring)About material changes small normalized number-NBR (TRSB508) with NBR (TRSB) material is?Different materials selected TRSB and TRSB508.-If you use NBR (TRSB508), why can't 196 is the number of cavities? Any quality problem occurs? It is 0110 is basically for the same reason. Results determined that our production technology, 196 pieces took more than 64 should take reasonable and determined.-Mold fee (196Cav.--> Mold cost 138000, 64Cav.--> Mold cost 80000)Because it cannot determine whether the correct type costs falling, so tell me mold fee calculation.-Leaves small-slip, so cannot understand the mould cost calculation.75W010-0140 (Bush)-What is the reason to Transfer molding by changing the material? What is the nature of the material?Is the liquidity of the curing process.-Have said that to improve the quality by Transfer molding, but what is better? That's why above. Transfer molding, quality becomes better part no other as well why not? Use the materials. Better cost efficiency, will come at a cost on the comp was comp for that.Arrangements must be made to questions above can be described in meeting.Next week's meeting (9/2015 14-18) to has been wanting.Have contacted after final scheduled meeting.Thank you.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

P / No.75W010-0110 (CUSHION, SHIFT LEVER ANTI-RATTLE)
for the number of materials taken by the change 25664
- NBR, you either have different if the material of the FKM.
There is a difference that nitrile rubber and fluorine rubber. Of course property is different large.
Specifically How different or are difficult to confirm at this, to the specified your design like the material
I think I can confirm a difference to more clearly if you can contact us.
- If you use the FKM, What is the impact After the number taken up in 256. Explanation please.
If you 256 up in FKM, without pressing machine Oshikire the material on all cavities,
it is not possible to apply a suitable pressure, it is not possible to make products of the results reasonable quality.
- What is the difference between the quality of the parts to be made ​​in the take-up number 64 and 256.
64 What is better quality than 256 cavities in any thing that was made ​​in the cavity.
for placement are also involved, it is the minute categorically less is No cavity said to be so, easy to ensure quality in the above reasons.
- Mold costs (256Cav .--> Mold cost 210,000, 64Cav .--> Mold cost 100,000)
How to edge of the type costs that it can not determine whether or not correct, why not ask tell me how to calculate the mold cost.
Because I do not go out detailed specification from the mold shop, the calculation of mold costs we can not understand. 75W010-0120 (Cushion Spring) - R section (corner size (R)) is, but is less than or equal to 1, do you why more difficult than when the 1.5. If you do not want to work with EDM, what problem happens. Because I can not work the magnitude of R that is specified on the size of the convenience in the end mill will be EDM need. 75W010-0130 (Ring) for that material is less number of takes by change - the material of the NBR (TRSB) and NBR (TRSB508)? Different and selected material in TRSB and TRSB508. - If you use the NBR (TRSB508), can not I to 196 the number of take why. Do you happen any quality problem. It is basically the same reason as 0110. result of our production technology has determined, is more of the 64 up than the 196-cavity has been determined to be reasonable. - Mold costs (196Cav .--> Mold cost 138,000, 64Cav .--> Mold cost 80,000) How edge of type costs that it can not determine whether or not correct, why not ask tell me how to calculate the mold cost. Because I do not go out detailed specification from the mold shop, the calculation of mold costs we can not understand. 75W010-0140 (Bush) - What are the reasons for the Transfer molding by changing the material. What is the nature of the material. This is the liquidity of vulcanization. - Transfer molding There is talk of improving the quality by making it, but what is the better. This is the above-mentioned reason. Transfer molding in And then do you not similarly why other part numbers Once good quality. It is used properly by the material. Things that can go in a cost on the Comp has a person who was in the comp, it is because cost efficient. We hope prepared to be explained by the meeting for the above question. Meeting will have wanted to during the next week (September 14 to 18, 2015). Ask be contacted if you confirm the schedule of meetings. Thank you for your attention.