詳細の履歴が追跡できていないのですが、Config-Aなど順次対応の最

詳細の履歴が追跡できていないのですが、
Config-Aなど順次対応の最中、急遽、Config-Bにて先行150pcsずつの試作指示がございまして、Config-Bを最優先して対応行いました。
その後、Config-Bの部材をそのままシフトして、Config-Kへ突入しメインビルド始まりました。 config-Aのことは、置かれているようです。

なお、Config-A/B/Kの仕様が全く一緒のことで、先日、LCMの営業担当と話して、config-Aの再納入が必要もないのではないか。。。
(config-Aが、ただのmini buildですが、結局、コロコロの変更でConfig-Bの150pcsとMain buildのConfig-Kが既に納入済みのこと、もう要らないのではないか）

申し訳ございませんが、config-Aの32pcsずつmini buildの納入がやっぱり必要なのでしょうか？
（SCIキャンセルになっていないし、同仕様のconfig-B/Kの残サンプルあれば、対応も可能でしょうが）

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Is not to track details of
Config-A, sequential response during the haste, at Config-B ahead by 150 pcs prototype tells Sir Config-B's priority, did respond.
Then, members of the Config-B intact shift and began more entered the Config-K. config-A that seems to reside.

, Config-A/B/K specification is totally with in, the other day, talking with LCM sales representative,not config-A re delivery is not necessary.
(mini build of just config-A, but after all the changes of Colo Colo Config-K Config-B 150 pcs and the Main build is already delivered on that, you don't need anymore ）

sorry, config-A 32 pcs each mini build delivery is required after all what?
（ and not to cancel the SCI, same specifications config-B/K residual sample, if possible would ）

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

History of details I not been able to track, but
during the corresponding sequential, suddenly, is there is a prototype indication of each preceding 150pcs in Config-B, and we cope with the highest priority the Config-B and Config-A were.
Then, shift as it is member of Config-B, began the main build and rushed to the Config-K. things config-A is, seems to have been placed. It should be noted that the specification of Config-A/B/K is that all together, the other day, talking to the sales staff of LCM, or not than there is no need to re-delivery of config-A. . . (Config-A is the just a mini build but, after all, that of delivery already, Config-K of Main build and 150pcs of Config-B or dont need another already in the change of Colo) I am sorry, 32pcs of each config-A or will we need after all delivery of mini build? (It is not already SCI canceled, or if the remaining samples of the config-B / K of this specification, it is probably also available)

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

The details of the history is not in a hurry, tracking, and sequentially at the middle Config -- such as the preceding instruction A prototype of 150 PCs in Config -- B, was carried out with the highest priority. Config B. Then, at the Config and member of B shift is launched into the main Config K to build on. It is A config, as is. Well, the other day that Config -- A and B and K specifications, with all the talk of the LCM salesIf there is no need to re - Construction of A config. I'm sorry, but not at you. A RI config, mini, but after all, build Config. Please change B 150 PCs and build on the Config K Main supplier already, already no longer in the config A 32 pcs each supplier Mini build necessary after all? To be cancelled at the same SCI specifications B K config and residual samples, including the possible correspondence