新井です 前回のTV会議に出ていなくて申し訳ありません。 板書議事録に

新井です



前回のTV会議に出ていなくて申し訳ありません。



板書議事録にもありましたが「SF2-ACUM容量が

1.28L必要な理由 (BML-Cとどうしても共通化させ

なければならない理由)」 は何なのでしょうか？



議事録に「構造的には頑張れば収まる」ようにも

書いてありましたが、ちょっとしんどいです。

コスト的にも、共用化での物量効果より、材料費

削減の方が有利です。

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Arai isWithout meeting this last time out, sorry.To transcribe handwriting "SF2-ACUM capacityWhy should 1.28 L (BML-C just shared with meMust be the reason) ", or what?In the minutes to fit if you hang in the structureThere, kinda tough.Cost and volume effect on dual-use materials.The reduction is advantageous.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Is Arai sorry not come out in the last of TV conference. Blackboard there was also in the minutes "SF2-ACUM capacity (absolutely is common with BML-C required reason 1.28L What what's the reason must)"? Also to "fit if luck in structure" to the proceedings was written, but it is a little tough. In terms of cost and in terms of, than the physical effects in the sharing, the material cost is advantageous reduction.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Arai.
In the last TV conference and I"m sorry.
"There was SF ACUM capacity in two minutes to the blackboard
Why you need to 1.28 L of BML -- and I C common
What if the reason have?
In the "structural" if he tries to fit in
It was tough, but just.
Cost sharing, in effect, the amount of material cost
It is advantageous for the reduction.