斎藤さん、お疲れ様です。ジッチマさんからモロッコ向けBBのハンドリング

斎藤さん、

お疲れ様です。

ジッチマさんからモロッコ向けBBのハンドリングチャージの費用負担を請求されました。
KLとKLTとの仕切りはFOBです。FOBであれば、通常、この費用はKLT負担のはずです。
船社は指定のようですが、「他社の費用はこうだからこうしてほしい」みたいな交渉はされた結果なのでしょうか。
また、全部をKLが負担というのもよくわかりません。一度、KLT内で調整いただけませんか。

高野

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Saito,

thank you's.

Were charged cost burden for Morocco BB handling charge from ジッチマ.
Partitioning between KL and KLT is a FOB. FOB, typically this cost of KLT burden should be is.
Carrier is specified, but talks like a 'third-party costs are thus so they wanted' results were what.
Also, all KL burden that I'm not good. Once, cannot be adjusted in the KLT?

Takano

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Mr. Saito, cheers for good work is. Has been claimed the expense of handling charge of Morocco for BB from Jitchima's. Partition of the KLT and KL is FOB. If FOB, usually, this cost should be borne by the KLT. Shipping company is like specified but, what's the result of negotiations have been "cost of other companies want you to do this because it is this" such like. In addition, KL's all that burden even I do not know well. Once, Could you adjust the KLT within. Takano

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

So Mr. Saito. For too ジッチマ from Morocco was charged to expense of BB handling charge. The partition of KL and KLT FOB. In FOB, generally, the cost should be KLT burden. As the ships company is the result of the cost of this because I want to be like "the negotiations? At the whole KL burden as well. Once you KLT regulation. Takano, too.