下記の件、ご指示とおり、Ms. Sukanyaとともに大紀アルミさんガ

下記の件、ご指示とおり、Ms. Sukanyaとともに大紀アルミさんガラヤポーンさんを訪問して確認いたします。本日は経理システムのアップデート作業があるため、明日になると思います。(小職は社長や大紀アルミの藤原CFOにわざわざ時間を割いていただく案件ではないと考えていますが、社長のお考えが異なれば、ご指示ください。)

具体的な確認事項は次のとおりと理解しています。
a. 下記メールの1)～4)の相違
b. 4)による金額の変化

なお、4)の計算方法はエクセルのシートを開いて良く理解できました。最低使用量(DCQ)が現状の506.15*1である限りは、新しい計算式のほうが必ず安くなると思われます*2。

*1累積使用量によりますが、DCQが600を超えない限り、新しい計算方式が必ず安くなります。あまり心配しなくても良いかと思います。
*2おそらくガス会社の計算ミスで11月だけ新方式が高くなっていると思います。(K32 = 0.1886 ➔0.1386)

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

I confirm to visit Garayapon's Daiki Aluminium's matter of following your instructions as, with. Sukanya ms. I think because there is a work update of accounting systems, to become tomorrow today. (Shoshoku believes that it is not a project have you taking the time all the way to Fujiwara cfo of Daiki aluminum and president, but you think the president is different, please specify.)

Checklist specific next I understand the street.

B difference of 1) to 4) of. Following e-mail a.The change of the amount of money

by 4), I was able to better understand open the sheet of Excel calculation method 4). It seems that as long as the lowest usage (dcq) is 506.15 * 1 of the current situation, more of the new formula is always cheaper * 2.

* It depends on the one cumulative usage, but as long as dcq does not exceed 600, a new calculation method will always be cheaper. And I think whether it is not necessary to worry too much.
* I think the new system is that it is heavily only in November in the miscalculation of the gas company, perhaps two. (K32 = 0.1886 ➔ 0.1386）

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

As below, your instructions are, along with Ms. Sukanya daiki aluminum and I will make a visit to ガラヤポーン. For today is the updating of the accounting system would be tomorrow. (Please indicate believe I not in case you spend the time President and daiki aluminum Fujiwara CFO, President may think different. )

Follows and understands specific questions.
a. email 1)-4) the diff
b. 4) By amounts change

, 4) for better open Excel sheet calculations, I could understand. As long as the minimum amount (DCQ) 506.15 * 1 the status quo seems to be of the new calculation formula must be cheaper * 2.

* Depending on 1 cumulative usage does not exceed 600 DCQ, unless new calculation method is always cheaper. I would worry too much about having too good?.
I * 2 probably miscalculation of the gas company only 11 months and new ways have higher. (K32 = 0.1886 ➔ 0.1386)

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

I visit the pawn which a Taiki aluminum Gullah hates with following matter, instructions street, Ms.Sukanya and confirm it. I think that it is tomorrow in order that there is the update work of the accounting system today. (The low-ranking official thinks that it isn't an item having Fujiwara chief financial officer of the president and the Taiki aluminum cut time expressly, but please direct it if a thought of the president is different. )

The concrete confirmation matter understands it as follows.
Of the a. follows email1)～Difference in 4)
b.Is change

of the amount of money by 4);,You might open a seat of the Excel and were able to understand the calculation method of 4). At least consumption (DCQ) of the present conditionsAs far as is 506.15*1; *2 that it seems that a new calculating formula is reduced by all means.

*It depends on 1 accumulation consumption, but a new calculation method is reduced by all means unless DCQ exceeds 600. I think whether I don't need to worry too much.
*Perhaps I think that a new method rises by 2 by a calculation error of the gas company only in November. (K32 = 0.1886 ➔0.1386)